What Happened to Threads? Why Meta’s Twitter (X) Rival Fell Flat
Threads was meant to kill Twitter (X). Now no one’s talking about it.
Here’s what went wrong — and what it means for social media.
Remember Threads? Meta’s hyped-up “Twitter killer” that stormed onto the scene in July 2023, promising a friendlier, faster, more connected text-based social network. A year later… crickets. We’re breaking down what happened to Threads, why users dropped off, and what it means for the future of social platforms.
THE WHO, WHAT & WHY
Threads was Meta’s answer to the chaos over at Twitter (now X) following Elon Musk’s acquisition. Built as a direct competitor, it allowed Instagram users to seamlessly log in and start posting short, text-based updates in a familiar feed format.
Within 5 days of launch, Threads hit 100 million signups — breaking every record in social media history. It had hype, celebrity endorsements, and Meta’s machine behind it. But beneath the surface, problems were brewing.
Why it mattered: If any brand could dethrone Twitter, it was Meta. And the app’s early success signalled a potential shift in how we’d share public conversations online. But success in the social media game is about retention, not downloads — and Threads missed the mark.
KEY REASONS THREADS FLOPPED
Here’s where it all went sideways:
No chronological timeline at launch — users were force-fed algorithmic content from strangers.
No trending topics or hashtags, making real-time conversation impossible.
Lack of basic features like DMs, search for individual posts, or proper topic discovery.
Over-moderated, hyper-clean environment that stripped the platform of the edgy, chaotic energy people loved about Twitter/X.
Rapid user drop-off — within a month, daily active users fell by over 80%.
Meta essentially built a minimalist text feed without the DNA that makes platforms like Twitter addictive: debate, chaos, breaking news, niche subcultures, and unfiltered humour.
WHY IT MATTERS / WHAT IT MEANS FOR THE CULTURE
The Threads saga is a reminder that social media isn’t just about features — it’s about culture. People don’t stay on a platform because it’s clean and friendly; they stay because it feels alive, unpredictable, and reflective of the digital world’s pulse.
For brands and marketers, it highlights the importance of reading cultural energy before investing heavily in new platforms. Threads had the infrastructure, but it never built community, memes, or a sense of belonging. In 2025, authenticity and subculture rule the internet — and no amount of Meta muscle can manufacture that overnight.
WHAT'S NEXT / UPCOMING TRENDS
While Threads is technically still live, its relevance is buried. The future of text-based social media is fragmenting into niche communities, Discord servers, Reddit-like forums, and ephemeral group chats.
If your brand’s social strategy still revolves around chasing the next big platform, it’s time to rethink. Focus on building community where your audience already is, not where you hope they’ll be.
FOLLOW
Want the inside track on what actually works in digital marketing? Follow EIE Digital for bold brand insights, marketing conspiracies, and cultural trends that move the needle. Subscribe to Social Proof and never miss a drop.